Wednesday, March 23, 2005

Michael Admits He Didn’t Know What Terri Wanted

This is an incredible evidentiary discovery from the CNN transcripts! Too bad the judges refuse to hear new evidence that contradicts the adjudicated facts in the case. This statement illustrates the smug arrogance of the man. He knows that he can essentially admit to perjury on national television without any repercussions from the appropriate "controlling legal authority."

" . . . M. SCHIAVO: Yes, I do. But this is not about them, it's about Terri. And I've also said that in court. We didn't know what Terri wanted, but this is what we want . . . "


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home